[EDIT] Inb4 more people try to suggest that I’m mourning the loss of this scumbag capitalist fuck: No, I’m not sad he’s dead. No, I don’t think corporate murder is acceptable and no, I would not ever rat to police if I knew the shooter and yes, I believe the punishment fits the crimes he’s committed against untold thousands of people. THAT SAID…

I’m not down with vigilante murder or anything because it seems like the slipperiest of slopes toward chaos, but what other option is there in a situation where someone seeks to make an impact in this way? You can’t just beat up evil CEOs and let them go back to work. It would be naïve to expect them to change their ways when faced with consequences for their actions and then promptly let go. It just seems like the chances that it emboldens their penchant for exploitative behaviour and disdain for people in need are too high.

We’re just born into and strapped to this capitalist ride and expected to sit quiet and make these leeches their billions. How else can this cancerous greed possibly be dealt with? Is vigilante murder the only effective option? Honest questions. I’m terribly conflicted and I’m genuinely curious what more reasonable and intelligent minds than mine think about this because I can’t think of an alternative to murder in this case.

Ideally, we wouldn’t have to resort to vigilante killings to level the playing field but I 100% understand that we don’t live in a society where the rich will ever give a fuck about the rest of us or would ever sacrifice their power over us in the name of goodwill.

  • Draghetta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    Party funding and salaries are not “the money” that is in politics, those are peanuts. Do you think Elon musk is interested in a government job because he wants the paycheck?

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      I wasn’t taking about that at all.

      I’m most countries there time of money in politics is way healthier than in the us.

      So it’s possible to regulate that better.

      • Draghetta@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        Yes but you are talking about party funding. Politicians are not into it for the funding, that’s peanuts.

        The relationship between politics and money is already regulated, that’s what embezzlement laws are about. They can be improved, but you’ll find it’s harder than you would think.

        Surely decoupling money from politics is not possible, which is what I was answering about.

        • Akasazh@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 days ago

          No I was talking about electoral funding, through super PACs and the like. How individuals and companies can buy their way into politicians favor.

          I was talking about that the dollar amount raised during elections is a measure of success. That’s not the case in almost all developed countries. And it’s wrong.