🫩🫩🫩🫩

  • Seefra 1@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    187
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    “Hey Linux, can you just delete this file please?”

    “Sure thing bud, a program is using it, it’s ok, I will just unlink the inode anyway, the program can still access it until it closes the file”

    • xthexder@l.sw0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      72
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      This is honestly one of my favorite features of the linux filesystem. As a dev it makes things like replacing and hot-reloading plugins way easier.

      It turns out you can kind of get the same functionality on Windows if you rename the open file and place the new one with the original name, but it’s a bit of a hack.

        • mcv@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          7 days ago

          Yeah, super annoying. In Linux you can rename or move it and the app using it doesn’t care.

          Although having the option of listing the app using a file so I can kill the app would also be really nice to have. I’m sure Linux has something for that too, but I don’t know what it is.

        • REDACTED@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 days ago

          That’s actually a thing, but I’m not entirely sure in which cases. Probably only for services and not apps, but I’ve done that myself where deleting a file was impossible, but renaming it and deleting it worked.

        • xthexder@l.sw0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          Maybe it’s only possible in certain cases, but I can tell you for certain it’s possible with running exe’s and loaded dll’s. I have a CMake step on Windows that does this rename hack so my builds don’t fail if I still have the app running.

      • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 days ago

        It turns out you can kind of get the same functionality on Windows if you rename the open file and place the new one with the original name, but it’s a bit of a hack.

        Only if you don’t have OneDrive working. In that case, you have to wait for it to sync or it won’t go through.

        Anytime I have an issue at work where I can’t change or delete a file, it’s a 50/50 split between Excel and OneDrive being the cause

      • optional@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Yes. On Linux/Unix you don’t delete the file, you just delete it’s name, which is merely a link to the actual file. That’s also the reason why the syscalls name is actually unlink and not delete. As soon as there’s nothing pointing to a file anymore, it is deleted.

        As long as a process holds a file handle, there’s still a reference to said file, so it won’t be deleted. That saved me once, when I accidentally deleted a file I wanted to keep: As there still was some process keeping it alive, I could just go to /proc/[process id]/fd/[file descriptor id] and copy it to a safe location.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Good to know, and helps me understand code dealing with filesystems a little better. I’m curious how the kernel keeps track of it all, just a counter maybe?

          On Linux/Unix you don’t delete the file, you just delete it’s name, which is merely a link to the actual file.

          Is that different on other systems?

          • optional@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I don’t know how NTFS does it, but on FAT filesystems the directory table contains the filename along with all the other file metadata (access rights, creation date, size, etc). Only the list of sectors containing the actual data is separate. That means that you can’t have two filenames for the same file on FAT filesystems.

            If you want to learn more about this, the data structure UNIX filesystems use, and FAT filesystems lack is called inode.