• OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    The actual goalpost I was forwarding (that Americans bear responsibility for the current state of their leadership)

    Show me where I disputed that claim, ever.

    The only claim that’s in dispute is you repeatedly trying to defend the American system as democratic, because you’ve bought into to American propaganda.

    You don’t get to decide which of your positions I’m challenging.

    • a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Show me where I disputed that claim, ever.

      Okay, so you agree. Great.

      Tell me then: if America is not democratic, then why do Americans bear responsibility for the state of their leadership? Compare: I don’t blame Chinese citizens for Xi Jinping because the Chinese people literally have no control over his tenure in power. So if America is, like China, not a democracy, then why should I not give the American people the same grace?

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        If a driver doesn’t press the brakes because he was on his phone, but also the brake lines had been cut so it would not have mattered if he had, then would you say the driver is completely innocent?

        Give Americans an actually democratic system and there’s a good chance we’d still fuck it up. The fact that we suck is a separate fact from the fact that our political system is a sham. As I explained to you in my first reply.

        To speak in your language, it’s kind of like how over 90% of Chinese people say they approve of their government in anonymous polls conducted by Western institutions. I would say that those people do, in fact, carry some culpablity for their government’s actions, regardless of whether the government is democratic or not.

        • a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          If a driver doesn’t press the brakes because he was on his phone, but also the brake lines had been cut so it would not have mattered if he had, then would you say the driver is completely innocent?

          Right. So your position is that the American people didn’t vote for Trump (even though there was no mass voter fraud, and they had another candidate they could have voted for) but they still would have voted for Trump even if they could have.

          Gotchu.

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            I have absolutely no idea how you got any of that from what I said.

            The majority of voters did vote for Trump in our undemocratic elections, the second time. Nearly half did the first time too.

            You seem to be confusing “being able to vote for Trump” with “the system being democratic.”

            • a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              You seem to be confusing “being able to vote for Trump” with “the system being democratic.”

              Well, that makes it democratic enough for them to have not voted for Trump and, like I’ve said repeatedly, that’s all that matters in this context

              • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                That’s all that matters if you’re looking at culpability. It’s not all that matters if you’re looking at whether the system is democratic.

                You literally just tried to argue that Americans wouldn’t be culpable if the system isn’t democratic. You keep trying to equate these two separate questions. I keep trying to tell you that the system is undemocratic and Americans are culpable.

                There is such a thing as an undemocratic election. If you vote for a bad person in an undemocratic election, you are morally culpable for their actions. That fact doesn’t somehow imply that the undemocratic election is somehow a democratic election.

                • a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Like Ive said numerous times before, I don’t care if the system meets your standards of purity. All I care about is if the election was democratic enough to hold the American people responsible. And that doesn’t even seem to be something you are disagreeing with at this point. You’re just getting your panties in a twist because “America” and “democracy” seems to be some sort of tankie trigger word for you

                  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    I guess I don’t understand what you’re doing in a “fuck the USA” comm if criticizing the American political system makes me a “tankie” in your eyes.