Hi all. I’ve been developing a conceptual physics framework that proposes a new way of looking at quantum measurement, time, and classical emergence using what I’m calling ‘constraint field interactions’ as the underlying mechanism.
This isn’t a formal academic paper (yet); I don’t have an institutional affiliation or physics PhD. But I am very serious about developing this model coherently and rigorously. The work is still evolving, but the core idea is that reality may have stabilized through self-reinforcing patterns of constraint resolution, producing what we experience as time, classical causality, and observer-aligned outcomes.
The paper touches on:
- quantum measurement as contextual constraint resolution
- observer-dependent reference frames
- shared reality through stable constraint fields
- emergence of classical time as an output of constraint interactions
- and more speculative ideas on pre-collapse structure and substrate-level information fields
I wrote it to be as accessible as possible while still diving deep into conceptual mechanics. I welcome critique, skepticism, alternate interpretations, and questions. If anyone here enjoys unpacking new ideas or spotting holes in speculative frameworks, I’d genuinely appreciate your thoughts. More than happy to send a copy or link to the full paper upon request.
Cheers!
https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html
Seriously, take a look at the crackpot index.