Veserr@sh.itjust.works to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 2 days agoStarmer’s position on Iran pleases no one, but that is because there are no good optionswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square2linkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down17cross-posted to: uk_politics@feddit.uktheguardian_us@ibbit.at
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkStarmer’s position on Iran pleases no one, but that is because there are no good optionswww.theguardian.comVeserr@sh.itjust.works to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square2linkfedilinkcross-posted to: uk_politics@feddit.uktheguardian_us@ibbit.at
minus-squareZedstrian@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 days agoNot supporting violations of international law is a pretty good option.
minus-squarethomasshikari@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoYeah I thought this was a rare positive action from him.
Not supporting violations of international law is a pretty good option.
Yeah I thought this was a rare positive action from him.