In commemoration of the upcoming Transgender Day of Visibility (TDOV), President Joe Biden issued a statement praising trans people’s contributions to society and describing actions his administration has taken to counter transphobic bullying and extremism. Additionally, many members of Biden’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) also issued their own statements affirming that community health depends on supporting trans people too.

“Transgender Americans are part of the fabric of our Nation,” Biden wrote in his statement. “Whether serving their communities or in the military, raising families or running businesses, they help America thrive. They deserve, and are entitled to, the same rights and freedoms as every other American, including the most fundamental freedom to be their true selves.”

    • whoreticulture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah you’re cool with voting in the fascist killing Palestinians, and shitting on people for caring about genocide. Very cool.

        • whoreticulture@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’m sure you’ve heard all the arguments, if you are curious about my thoughts you can dig through my comment history or do some googling and guess at what they could be.

          • Feddyteddy@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            I think your sphincter is squeezing your neck too tight, and it’s cutting off the circulation to your brain.

              • Feddyteddy@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                That’s so nice of you to say! I’m quite proud of it. It just came to me out of nowhere for this comment. By all means, use it as if it were your own.

                  • Feddyteddy@lemmy.sdf.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Look who it is! It’s my adorable little angry puppy that follows me around to various threads. Half the credit for this line goes to you and your tight little brown starfish.

                    pats them on their little red head

      • webadict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Please list the descriptors that show Joe Biden is a fascist, because I’m looking at Umberto Eco’s and I see… maybe 1, if you reach a bit: “appeal to the middle class”

        You probably fall under at least 4 though.

        • whoreticulture@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          he’s funding a genocide, is the leader of a country that has one of the proportionally largest prison populations in the world that are used as slaves, the U.S. is a police state who spies on its own citizens and regularly just bombs/assassinates activist movements. Any president not acting to dismantle that is fascist.

          shocking that you’re just learning this now, but the United States are the bad guys

            • whoreticulture@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Idk why your definition of fascism doesn’t include labor camps, war-mongering, and a militarized policing of our own people.

              • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                Because that’s not fascism. Fascism is hypernationalism and tacit acceptance of political violence to support your goals. Everything you’ve mentioned is usually there with fascist regimes, but it isn’t what makes the regime fascist.

                • whoreticulture@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  There are many definitions of fascism, but, the United States absolutely fits the definition you just gave.

                  Not every country has their flags flying constantly. Not every country has a pledge of allegiance to a flag in their schools. And the United States has bombed, imprisoned, and assassinated domestic political threats.

                  • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Hmm. I do agree, the pledge of allegiance is really weird and fascistic. And you do have a point on the violence.

                    I suppose I typically see the violence as needing to be more pervasive, like how Trump supporters send death threats to judges and political opponents and the whole Jan 6 thing. But throughout our history, we have had violent intimidation of oppositional political figures.

                    I think I wouldn’t call the US fascist because it isn’t significantly pervasive, but I completely see your point, and I don’t begrudge you identifying it as fascist. I certainly see why you think that and I can’t disagree beyond semantics.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      condemn anyone who won’t vote to stop a fascist dictator

      Finally standing up to Benjamin Netanyahu and all those Americans who keep voting for him

    • TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      When can we start voting for someone good instead of merely less bad? How do we get to that point?

      • VoterFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I would think it would take 4 back to back presidential election wins by the Democratic party. Maybe 3 if it included wipeouts of Republicans in Congress and at the state level. No party can survive being out of power for that long without changing and shifting towards were voters are and that leaves the Democrats room to shift left to solidify that flank.

        We’ve already had 1. We’re on the cusp of a possible second. That means we could be 4 years from a complete collapse of the Republican party, if people were actually serious about creating a real leftist movement in this country. That’s because winning is how you affect change. A loss just tells politicians that they need to be more like the winner.

        • TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          That’s a good start, I think. The tricky bit is I think you need thirty years straight of good decisions so that the next generation is fully done “correctly”. Will be harder to abuse the system after that.

          “Be more like the winner” is interesting. Trump is a populist and he was more worried about Bernie than Clinton.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          The California model. Render Republicans impotent, then you can start enacting real positive changes.

    • eldavi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I’m a trans person and condemn anyone who won’t vote to stop a fascist dictator that wants me dead from obtaining the nuclear codes

      i’ve been trying to find someone who’s life had been impacted by biden’s support of don’t-ask-don’t-tell; defense-of-marriage-act; executive-order-10450; ice; straight-marriage-only-in-2006 to ask if they still support him; but it seems that only the young who are ignorant of his past; those who “avoid politics”; and those that were never affected universally support him.

      if you’re not one of these three groups; i’d like to hear your thoughts on why he switched to pro-lgbt: do you think it’s because it was more politically advantageous of him? did he hate lgbt in the past because it acceptable and, if so, if it were still acceptable would he continue to hate lgbt?

      i ask because my life has been thoroughly fucked by each one of these policies and it took A LOT of effort to rebuild my life so it’s obvious that i wouldn’t support him; but i’m wondering if there’s anyone else out there whose life has also been thoroughly fucked by these policies, but still support him somehow.