Pennsylvania Avenue Subway, Reading Railroad, Philadelphia, 2004.

#photography

  • Dan Wallach@discuss.systems
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    @karlauerbach @mattblaze I used to spend a lot of my time in the 80’s in darkrooms. While I have a soft spot in my heart for the sharp smell of stop bath, the ability for Photoshop to adjust an image in seconds what would take substantially longer in a darkroom? Priceless.

    What the shift to digital from film did for me, both in terms of shooting and processing, was that it increased my willingness to experiment by lowering the cost (time and dollars). I really leveled up in my skills.

      • Steve Bellovin@mastodon.lawprofs.org
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        @mattblaze@federate.social @dwallach@discuss.systems @karlauerbach@sfba.social I was always pretty awful at darkroom work—pictures that I knew were there never came out the way that I felt that they should. I eventually resorted to dealing with a high-quality commercial lab. With digital, I can try things, undo them, copy the original and try different combinations, and more. Plus, of course, the nature of my chosen subjects means that I have to take a lot of pictures, most of which will be worthless.

        • Matt Blaze@federate.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          @SteveBellovin@mastodon.lawprofs.org @dwallach@discuss.systems @karlauerbach@sfba.social One of the benefits of being in NYC during the film era was the ready availability of high quality commercial labs - often open 24hrs - that served the commercial photography, advertising , and publishing industries. Particularly for E6 transparencies, you could get dip&dunk processing in less than an hour at any time of day for a few bucks/roll. Basically no commercial photographers, and even few fine art photographers, bothered to maintain dark rooms.