• AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    These do annoy me. Of course Newsom is not the best candidate but they are distracting everyone from how much better that would be than the current shitshow

    And I have to ask y’all, are we really going to an insists on an ideal candidate regardless whether they are electable?

    I have no idea whether Newsom is but he has name recognition, presidential presence, and a successful “populist” strategy. He has successfully positioned himself as a leading foil of Trump. All that stuff that seem necessary for getting elected even if they have no part in whether they would do well for their constituents. …. And they’re building a train!

    I do always wonder if this is just republicans trying to astroturf “both sides the same”.

    • Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think there’s this assumption that the more centrist a dem is, the more electable they are and that may have been true decades ago. Now though? With how polarized the electorate is, people either vote for their party’s candidate or the couch. Trump got roughly the same number of votes in 2024 (77M) as 2020( 74M) maybe he changed some minds; but Harris got 7M fewer votes than biden (81->74). People stayed home. “Not trump” wasn’t enough to get excited about for enough folks, and that’s about all Newsom has to offer

      I genuinely believe Bernie is more electable than Newsom. We should give voters some credit

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean when it comes to primaries I do not vote on electability. I think that is how we get the democrats we have now. Come general though im not going to be supporting the republican by voting for them or not voting. Bernie was the supposed unelectable canidate and I voted for him but come the general I voted for clinton.