Like even a little description?

  • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    I believe this is an automated TestFlight push. Meaning there’s no direct user involvement, and it’s simply pulling commit messages.

    I’ve always treated the voyager TestFlight as a nightly build. Use the app as per normal, report any issues you find. You re not explicitly being asked to test something in particular (despite what the TestFlight prompts suggest.)

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    If its a commit message then not really you are rather limited on what you can put.

    If it were a pr then as long as it makes sense to the maintainers, who cares?

  • prettybunnys@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yes, the what to test file is release notes, they just are not populating them and are likely falling back to another string (the commit message)

  • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’ve never looked at the code base and I could make a reasonable guess as to what it’s about. I’m guessing it has to do with pasting a fediverse link into a post and making it point to the actual instance instead of the federated link.

    I could be wrong but it looks like it would make sense to the maintainers of the code.

    Or am I just missing a joke here?

    • toofpic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The fact that you’re asking proves the description is bad. URLs? “Fixed: when a URL is passed to AAA, BBB should be CCC, but it is DDD instead”. "Stupid* descriptive commit messages are unbeatable. You might as well copy the whole bug description if it’s not super long and was formulated by a person used to describe things (so, any good QA)

      • CTDummy@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I think the description is sufficient. As long as the dev and contributors know what it’s referring to. Isn’t this app mostly worked on by one person? I think people complaining about short action descriptions or calling them stupid is a bit excessive. Unless both you and the OP are looking to contribute?