I don’t see the connection here. I think you’re drawing a cause-effect relationship here that doesn’t exist. Dual incomes aren’t necessary because we have appliances, it’s because wages haven’t kept up with productivity or inflation. I don’t see how you’re coming to the conclusion that it’s somehow a direct consequence of labor saving appliances.
But you’re conflating different aspects of the system. Modern conveniences aren’t the product of capitalism, they’re the product of human invention. Yes they were produced under capitalism, but they would’ve been developed under any economic system that supports human invention.
The consumption trap you’re talking about, the whole “Working jobs we hate, to buy things we don’t need, to impress people we don’t like” thing, is a separate thing. Dishwashers and refrigerators aren’t the same as jetskis and handbags.
I don’t see the connection here. I think you’re drawing a cause-effect relationship here that doesn’t exist. Dual incomes aren’t necessary because we have appliances, it’s because wages haven’t kept up with productivity or inflation. I don’t see how you’re coming to the conclusion that it’s somehow a direct consequence of labor saving appliances.
Once again being too literal it’s the whole system conveniences are just a part of that
But you’re conflating different aspects of the system. Modern conveniences aren’t the product of capitalism, they’re the product of human invention. Yes they were produced under capitalism, but they would’ve been developed under any economic system that supports human invention.
The consumption trap you’re talking about, the whole “Working jobs we hate, to buy things we don’t need, to impress people we don’t like” thing, is a separate thing. Dishwashers and refrigerators aren’t the same as jetskis and handbags.