• nxfsi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Did that person draw that specific frame all by themselves? If no then it’s still using others’ copyrighted work + own input.

          • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            So what you’re tell me all artists in history should be sending residuals to the first caveman to draw on a wall?

            You know what, sure, let’s go with that. Maybe copyright enforcement is the way to discovering time travel in this reality.

            • Touching_Grass@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              Absolutely. If you create a piece of art. Its precious and anyone who ever looked at that piece owes the artist something. This debt should be paid for life and beyond for all time. End of story

      • herrvogel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        The only true artist is Ooonga Baloonga, who invented art when he drew something roughly resembling an animal on a random cave wall 6 bajillion years ago. Everything since then is derivative bullshit, lifeless imitations of his unique vision.

  • Xanvial@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    But isn’t the reply is right?

    What’s the relation between using other people art and the user credentials? Should the AI art okay as long as the one published it already has good credentials?

    • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      This isn’t about “good credentials”, the person making the post was actually an animator for Invincible (where the image is from).

      So it’s the artist posting a meme with their own art from a series, someone accusing them of stealing the art (saying they are as bad as AI) while the artist was actually part of the team that made the series. What is there not to get?

        • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Not at all, but this is how this sub works. It usually goes:

          1. Person A posts something

          2. Person B tells them they stole it or have no clue about the topic

          3. Someone brings up that Person A is actually the owner of the thing, or a leading expert in the field (see the right side of the the meme in this case)

          4. (optional) Person B finds out they are dumb and apologize

          • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            And at no point does OP actually explain what the fuck is going on, just act smug when we don’t immediately know what they’re on about.

    • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The original poster (Jessie Lam) worked on Invincible as an animator, so they did use their own art for that meme, which is a screenshot from Invincible.

      • jarfil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        On the other hand… animators usually sell their work to the studio… so “technically” it is no longer “theirs”, they have no right to use a copy without the studio’s permission… 🤷

      • rymdimperiet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yet the original characters Invincible and Omni-man were created by Robert Kirkman, who did not illustrate the original comicbooks (I think). Man, this thing goes deeeep.