Throw it on the pile? I guess?

  • Jikiya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    What you say is true, but everybody has lost the game if nukes are used. Their states wont be inhabitable either.

    • NannerBanner@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s more about the threat, isn’t it? If the other side believes you might be suicidally crazy, they might not want to fight the war, even if otherwise it would be a one sided victory.

      • Jikiya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        The threat indeed, why we had a “nice” cold war, instead of the human ending one. I think both sides would have some amount of them. Not sure how that would play out since we’ve never had a large scalce war between two nuclear powers. Have only had small limited area, limited troop skirmishes. Like USSR/China near Mongolia and Pakistan/India at various border points. And even more limited is the India/China border skirmishes, that dont even have rifles, but rocks and sticks.