• SSJ2Marx [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m still reading but it seems like he might be referring to Hambantota International Port. Per Wikipedia:

    Construction of the port commenced in January 2008. In 2016, it reported an operating profit of $1.81 million but was considered economically unviable. As debt repayment got difficult, the newly-elected government decided to privatise an 80% stake of the port to raise foreign exchange in order to repay maturing sovereign bonds unrelated to the port. Of the two bidding companies, China Merchants Port was chosen, which was to pay $1.12 billion to Sri Lanka and spend additional amounts to develop the port into full operation.

    • Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s a strange event. So the government privatised the port (which we all know goes swimmingly, just look at post-Soviet Russia), China swoops in with investments (which is normal), but then gets a century long lease. Why? What for? Do they get exclusive rights for using the port?

      Just strange stuff all around

      • SSJ2Marx [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        “Privatization” but the owning company is another country’s state corporation - come to think of it, that also happened to British Rail, with big parts of the line being bought up by other European countries’ state train companies.

        This all happened pre-COVID too - most of the articles about the Belt and Road failing are about debts going bad directly as a result of COVID’s trade slowdown, so whatever the heck is going on it appears to be to be a one off at the very least.