• data1701d (He/Him)@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          EDIT: I apologize. This was a bit snarkier in tone than I intended, and probably escalated conversations in ways that I shouldn’t have. A more civil way to put it is I disagree on the standard of “seriousness” ascribed to the earlier Star Trek series; take the Riker maeuver, for instance.

          Ah, yes, Star Trek, the “dead serious” show.

            • USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website
              shield
              M
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              18 days ago

              Complaining about “kids these days ruining Star Trek” is just sad, Bud. If you can’t engage with people on here without insulting them based on an assumed trait, kindly find another place to talk about Trek.

              And, just so we’re clear, I’m old enough that I’ve been watching Trek since before TNG was in production, and my favourite episodes have always been the silly ones.

              Remember when Kirk and Spock went to the gangster planet, and Kirk got really into the role?

              Remember when Worf, Alexander, and Troi were trapped on the holodeck populated by western archetypes that all had Data’s face and abilities, including the busty saloon madame? Talk about fully functional.

              Remember when, in the middle of a war with an existential threat, the crew of DS9 stopped to play baseball against Sisko’s academy bully?

              Remember when the Doctor started day dreaming, including improvising an opera about how Tuvok was overtaken by the pon’farr, and the potato shaped aliens using him to spy on the crew thought everything he was imagining was real?

              Remember almost every holodeck, Ferengi, mirror universe, or Lawaxana Troi episode? Star Trek can be deep and serious and meaningful, but it can also be very, very silly. And that’s awesome.

            • StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              18 days ago

              lol. You out yourself by citing Red Letter Media as if that is anything to take seriously other than a source of potential mis/disinformation on any given topic.

              I’ve been watching Trek since TOS was in first run. I’ve actually worked with real life military.

              Your attitude and comments strongly suggest you have neither experience.

              Current Star Trek is in no way less credible than the franchise was in any previous era of production. Yes, it’s making different choices for a different generation of audience but on balance it’s just as authentic.

                • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  18 days ago

                  “The Magicians in Space”, “Vampire Diaries in Space”, “Gossip Girl in Space”, you’ve got a million of these. I’d have trouble naming so many shows I don’t like. I forget about them pretty quickly because I just stop watching them and never engage with their fandom.

                  Something to consider.