• masterspace@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    He’s entirely right. Valve is just stealing money from gamers and developers by not lowering their fees.

    • criticalimpact@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      EGS is not profitable with the cut they take atm.

      Sweeney it’s on drugs if he thinks valves cut is unfair

    • xtapa@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      You’re right. Giving 30% for really fucking good platform services is way worse than having to find a publisher that takes in 70 to 90% of revenue and pushes devs to release unfinished games.

      • skulkingaround@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Yeah seriously. As a dev, that 30% cut gets you a lot of stuff with absolutely no additional charges. Trying to roll your own distribution for your downloads could exceed that 30% by itself after you:

        • Host the files somewhere that can be downloaded anywhere close to as fast as steam’s servers
        • Handle payment processing fees
        • Develop and maintain a site with high reliability

        And that’s only downloads. With steam you also get:

        • p2p networking tools
        • game server hosting
        • steam community integration
        • analytics
        • cloud saves
        • voip

        And like 50 other things. It’s ridiculously good value unless you’re developing some super low rent single player indie title. Even then, just having it available on steam will get you way more sales to make up for it.

        Sure, epic charges 10% but you basically only get distribution and some super half baked community features.