Update: Although we officially still have a few days remaining on this vote, it seems clear that this proposal won’t be voted in.

Thanks to everyone for their feedback and votes! I had expected a split vote on this one and it turned out around 1/3 for the proposal and 2/3 against, so that is a quite emphatic no! And of course, we will respect the vote.

I hope we can maybe revisit our instance blocking policies more generally after lemmy has properly working per-user instance blocks, as some folks commented as it will open up more options for personal choice. For example, we could keep a list of sanctioned instances (like csam site) as it works now, but maintain a separate list of “use with caution” instances (aka hesitations in fediseer) that are blocked by default in each user’s personal blocklist. But now users could choose to enable those sites for themselves if they wanted to.

For me, that seems like the best overall solution for user choice, and for the new user experience. But it may not sound good to you folks, so that’s why we have the voting system in place so we can get quality feedback and also hopefully generate ideas for improvements that will benefit the community.

On that note, anyone can contact me or any of the site admins if they have a proposal they want to appear here on the governance community, and we’ll be happy to help you out.

Unruffled


Hi mateys. I’m gonna keep this short and sweet because I don’t really have any skin in the game on this one. I am in fact quite happy to leave this decision up to the wider dbzer0 community. On that note, please do not comment on this post unless you are a dbzer0 user - we’d prefer not to have anyone else weighing in.

This post isn’t to convince anyone to re-federate or otherwise. In fact, our admin team genuinely doesn’t know for sure what our community sentiment is on the topic, or whether or not it’s worth a try. My guess is that the community will be quite divided on the topic, as many users are on the topic of hexbear. But the only way to find out for sure is to ask you, so here we are.

But I will say that for me personally, although we still have the occasional drama, and despite past run-ins, I have slowly grown to appreciate having some hexbear users around to help balance out all the turbolibs. While I think its fair to say our instance and theirs will never see eye-to-eye on certain topics, we have coexisted with them in relative calm over the past 12 months. If we can achieve harmonya ceasefire with hexbear, then maybe we could do the same with lemmygrad?

I’d also prefer our users to make their own choices with regard to instance blocking of leftist sites in particular.

Obviously there will be some folks here that will hate this idea, and some who think it is worth a try and/or would like to make their own choices with regards to blocking. All I will ask is that you go have a look at lemmygrad.ml before you vote, and ask yourself if there is anything posted there you think warrants keeping them defederated?

Because this might be a divisive topic, I’m setting the threshold for this proposal succeeding at >66.6% majority rather than the default >50% so that there is a clear mandate.

The proposal is as follows:

That dbzer0 removes lemmygrad.ml from our blocked instances list for a 1-month trial period. Another vote will then be conducted to either federate permanently or to reinstate the instance block.

Notes

  • AFAIK none of our admins have discussed this with lemmygrad prior to this post, so we don’t know how they will respond, even if this vote succeeds. But having just checked, we are not currently blocked from their end, so in theory re-federating will be a straightforward process (at least technically).
  • We really don’t want to cause a big rift in our instance over this, so please there is really no need to get into heated arguments (I mean, what are the chances? Lol). Your vote is what counts most and we will commit to be guided by the voting outcome.
  • If this vote succeeds we will reach out to their admins to see if we can come to some mutual agreement about reintegrating our communities while hopefully keeping conflict to a minimum. Having said that, some conflict is probably inevitable ngl. But I think we will be able to ride it out ok.
  • I’ve covered a lot of concerns and talked about conflict a lot, so I’ll just add that the big positive of re-federating is that there will be a ton of new users and content to interact with, which will hopefully add to the Lemmy experience for our users if the proposal is voted in.

expiry: 7

  • /0 Bot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    shield
    MB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    Acknowledged governance topic opened by https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/u/flatworm7591 Early Bird: a parrot, orangered colors Jolly Roger: an icon of pirate jolly roger skull wearing a hat, in orange-red, black and white colors A book with a loaf of bread in the cover  in orange-red, black and white colors Deck Hand: An icon of anchor crossed with two staves in orange-red, black and white colors First Mate: a pirate ship's steering wheel, orangered color

    This is a simple majority vote. The current tally is as follows:

    • For: First Mate: a pirate ship's steering wheel, orangered color First Mate: a pirate ship's steering wheel, orangered color Vouched: a minimalist compass icon. Orangered color
    • Against: Vouched: a minimalist compass icon. Orangered color
    • Local Community: +0.1
    • Outsider sentiment: Sympathetic
    • Total: +2.1
    • Percentage: 76.00%

    This vote will complete in 6 days


    Reminder that this is a pilot process and results of voting are not set in stone.

      • fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        Top just says who opened the topic, and below it the type of the vote (there are discussions and simpje voting)

        Each user has a relevant flair, like admin/donator/etc. The ‘for’ tells the total of all the relevant users flairs (not everybody has flairs!)

        The against is the same thing but with downvotes.

        Local community / total? I have no idea lol

        Percentage is the ratio of upvotes against downvotes (only counts votes from dbzer0 users)

        Outsider perspective is the same but for non dbzer0 users, and doesn’t show a percentage.

        The rest just tells when the vote ends and a footnote

    • redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      For an exact tally at 2025-07-16 20:45 UTC:

      Internal: 71 for, 118 against
      Outside: 36 for, 17 against

      The huge negative total is from the supporter votes.
      I did a cursory read of the outside instances votes and did not notice anything obviously suspicious. No ml or hex participation at all.

      As an aside, I think when one of the tallies of “For” or “Against” has enough votes to turn from a list to a bucket-list (i.e. object and number of occurrences, not a list of objects with repeats), then the other should do the same. Else it’s a bit confusing to read.

        • redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          19 days ago

          You are right, I have all downvotes accounted for, but I only see 93 upvotes, 16 are unaccounted for.
          My data seems to be incomplete somehow.

          Edit:
          my working theory is that the data stems from an instance defederated with hex, which blocks your votes showing up.
          Which might mean that 16 hexbears all exclusively voted up. Also maybe isn’t a good idea to let the instance vote that doesn’t have their votes intact. Though it does make for a very fitting russia-style election. Go vote, here is your first option, the upvote button and your second opti<data expunged>

  • fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    shield
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    So, it appears unruffled is MIA and I can’t reach him about this right now, so…

    I’ve revised this vote to make it more fair to the objectors (without permission :3). The main problem seems to be that lots of you don’t want to see grad content, and that’s fair; personally, I think their instance can produce shit takes a lot. So in this revision (and FAQ) I’ll try to address everything.

    The original plan was: run a trial vote, federate for a month, and then immediately run another vote to cement/reject this.

    Thanks to the comments here, here’s my personal changes:

    • Shorten the trial to two weeks instead, thanks to the two users that suggested this
    • After the trial, defederate immediately instead of running the next vote asap. Then once Lemmy properly fixes instance blocking (I.E. completely block an instance, as if it was actually defederated), we can run the vote, but more fairly; users who’ve this will get it, and users who reject this can easily block it, as if it never happened. Win win?

    Forgive me if I’m missing stuff, I’m far away from home and busy, and can’t do too much admin duty, and I’m only really commenting this since unruffled is offline xd.

    FAQ:

    Why, and why now?

    A lot of users, including one just recently who quit their instance, are sick of liberals. This is mainly meant to be a counterweight to that. Although seeing some users here live some of their content, I guess that’s a plus, too.

    As for why now? Well this really started over two casual conversations about grad, tankies, and liberals.It’s odd I have to admit, but oh well ¯_(ツ)_/¯

    What if I change my mind and want to defederate again?

    Besides the fact that instance blocking will be fixed during that time, anybody can always start up a vote for defederation! This isn’t a permanent, set in stone thing

    Didn’t we have good reason to defederate before? Why refederate?

    Well, kinda? Not really. I asked db0 about this and here is his response:

    The reasons are simple, I didn’t know much about hexbear at the start and took them at their words that they’re not just tankies, LG was stalwartly running apologia red fash regimes like North Korea and that was a bit too much to stomach for me. By how I learned that LG is basically the same as hexbear ideologically just without the left unity and dirtbag left approach.

    And afaik grad has been defederated from the very beginning anyway, no voting took place.

    I hope I covered everything. Personally? I don’t really care about this too much, whether it passes or not I probably wouldn’t mind. Most of us admins are neutral/skeptical, since we’ve never federated with them we’ve never interacted with them at all.

    Anyways, this is the community’s choice. If you guys don’t like it we won’t force you, and if you like it we’ll respect your wishes.

    If you have any other suggestions of compromise, feel free so reply here. Cheers

  • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    Do not defederate from any instance unless they are actively malicious (eg flooding with illegal content, targeting users with harassment/doxxing, or exploiting something). Though the second one is tricky as what constitutes “harassment” is tricky.

    A user has the option to block instances if they feel content on said instance is offensive or disagreeable to them.

    Rather than deny autonomy to users, refederate, and allow users to practice their own autonomy. If they’re terrified of the spooky leftists they are free to block the instance

    • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      Go spin up your own server with zero defederation policy and see how that works out for you. It will not be pleasant, that’s for sure.

      Everyone likes to say “wahh don’t defederate!!” But grad was defederated years ago for reasons, and the community decided on it back then, like this is asking to bring them back.

      And you can go find a server that federates with them if you want. There are probably several. Have fun.

  • Neverclear@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    I’m relatively new to lemmy, so I don’t know all of the history behind the tankie drama. Is the main concern just the usual flame wars? Or do they tend to cause more substantial disruptions?

  • cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    Since we already decided to embrace the concept of thought-crime with the ill-conceived ban on downvoting, we might as well embrace the autocrat fan club(s).

      • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        There was some brigading in GenAI art comms in db0, so some safety measures were put in place to protect them from downvote-all-ai-content -crowd

        If I remember correctly

        • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 days ago

          Ah. So there’s not a ban on downvoting, there’s a ban on brigading, or mass targeted downvoting. That clears up my confusion.

        • redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          20 days ago

          After that there was also at least one instance of a mod running wild and mass-banning a random user, probably for a few normal downvotes of genai content they didn’t like in their feed.

          Which ofc is not covered by that rule, but it being an instance rule was naturally one of the first things that user noticed when investigating their random bans.

          Edit: this is the yepowertrippinbastards thread

  • Venia Silente@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    I’ve had nothing but good experiences with hexbear in my lemmy history, I think, but then again I value more the communities than the users, and thus I prefer instances that won’t arbitrarily keep me from getting good content from elsewhere. I tend to not track where a user is in the Fediverse - every internet dog is free to create accounts anywhere, anyway.

    But… comparatively speaking, lg.ml seems to have little if anything to offer in comparison. The “tinted left” stuff that I care about can be more easily found in l.ml anyway.

    I’d say give it a two weeks trial. A full month might be a bit too much, both for the people pro and con.

  • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    I have slowly grown to appreciate having some hexbear users around to help balance out all the turbolibs.

    Same. There’s a difference between socialism, anarchism, communitarianism, communism, etc., and too many turbo libs chock all of that rich political tapestry up to “tankies”.

    While I do think there are dictator apologists out there, I don’t see the down side to open communication so long as there’s healthy debate. As soon as ad hominems are introduced, where people are attacked and not their ideas, I think that’s when we draw the line.

    I don’t really have any experience with lemmygrad though. Hexbear I’ve started warming up to. As with Lemmy.ml

  • dethedrus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    No thank you. I have zero interest in dealing with genocide apologists, regardless of their purported idealogical leanings.

  • redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    Genuinely why? Hexbear has some cool sizable communities that are mostly nonpolitical. Does lemmygrad have any of those?

    • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      It seems that not only do they not, they don’t get very many comments on any of their posts anyway, so I’m not sure what value it would at at all.

      Also looks like the majority of the posts there are from yogthos, whose lemmy.ml account I had to block from my feed, so that spent bode well to me, personally.

      • redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        The guy with the Unicode name? He has an alt on Lemmy.world I hate. Guy is the worst tankie meme come to life.

        I’m gonna say hard pass if that’s all they have.

        • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 days ago

          That is who I’m talking about, yes. You should probably not take my word for it and go scroll through the feed over there yourself before making a decision though.

  • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    Personally, if this account ends up federated with grad, I’ll abandon it. I’ve been here since the Reddit API migration 2 years ago, but I’ll drop this shit in half a heartbeat. I have other options. Y’all can do what you like.

    No thanks for me though. I also don’t want shit to do with hex or .ml. Those are harder to find instances defederated. But also worth having nothing to do with, I’ve found. For every serious anarchist or communist you might actually want to talk to, it seems you have 4 “for real bro” shitposters ruining it.

    I’m actively looking for places I don’t have to interact with that level of toxicity. If dbzer0 isn’t it anymore, I’ll move on.

    If I want to see what nonsense they have to say I can create an account on their dumb servers. I don’t want to know what assholes think, though, when they could -just as easily- go somewhere else to interact if they want to be heard.