return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 month agoJoe Rogan criticizes ICE tactics: 'Are we really going to be the Gestapo?'www.nbcnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square237linkfedilinkarrow-up1796arrow-down110cross-posted to: politics@lemmy.world
arrow-up1786arrow-down1external-linkJoe Rogan criticizes ICE tactics: 'Are we really going to be the Gestapo?'www.nbcnews.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square237linkfedilinkcross-posted to: politics@lemmy.world
minus-squarehector@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·1 month agoI didn’t read that drivel past the first sentence. Typical, projecting onto your victims, in this case those trying to get a winning strategy.
minus-squareAbidanYre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 month agoThe strategy of sitting on the sidelines because Kamala didn’t promise you a fucking pony? How well is that working out for you?
minus-squareHalfSalesman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 month agoWhy would strategy matter anymore?
minus-squareWarl0k3@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·1 month agoYou… already used that line.
minus-squarehector@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·1 month agoStop refusing to answer the question honestly and I would’ve stopped repeating it. But now we can stop, because absent an argument with merit, considering I reject everything you think now without addressing the original question, I will ignore you.
minus-squareWarl0k3@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-21 month agoYou refused to read that comment past the first sentence, how do you know they didn’t answer the question honestly or had a meritless argument?
I didn’t read that drivel past the first sentence. Typical, projecting onto your victims, in this case those trying to get a winning strategy.
The strategy of sitting on the sidelines because Kamala didn’t promise you a fucking pony? How well is that working out for you?
Why would strategy matter anymore?
You… already used that line.
Stop refusing to answer the question honestly and I would’ve stopped repeating it.
But now we can stop, because absent an argument with merit, considering I reject everything you think now without addressing the original question, I will ignore you.
You refused to read that comment past the first sentence, how do you know they didn’t answer the question honestly or had a meritless argument?