• RedDoozer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Anarchy is not by nature disorganized. Lack of hierarchy doesn’t mean lack of organization. Probably a well-functioning anarchist organization is better organized than most hierarchical ones.

    If friends are not there to defend the group of three, mutual aid is missing. That’s why it failed.

      • RedDoozer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Actually, there seems to be a bit of a mix-up. Let me clarify.

        In an anarchist group, enforcing anything goes against its fundamental principles.

        If personal gain is the motive, one isn’t truly aligned with the group’s social contract and isn’t considered part of it.

        Decisions are made collectively, without hierarchy. Voting or delegating organisational tasks to sub-groups is the norm.

        I won’t go into words like “attacking,” “defense,” or “threats” as they are military terms, far from the anarchist ethos.

        And I won’t call you “bro” or make you read theory. I feel you won’t.

      • BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        We don’t need to incentivse not selling people out. Heirarchy creates a set of incentives TO sell people out. Remove those incentives and people will for the most part not sell people out. You’ve got it exactly backwards.

        Ask your buddy mao about anarchist fighting forces. He literally took anarchist tactics around decentralized militias and used them to great success. The Vietnamese as well. Or have a look at the Spanish revolution, rojava, the Ukrainian black army, or the zapatistas if you need more proof that decentralized militant forces are effective and capable. It doesn’t warrant an in detail explanation because “but how fight if democracy???” is weak as fuck.

          • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Zapitista, Makhnovshchina, Rojava, Zomia, etc. didn’t all descend into mass crime and slaughter.

            What we’ve seen is these movements benefit the people living there.

              • perestroika@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                YPG, the militia formed during the seperation of Rojava from the Syrian government, have been accused by Human Rights groups of using Child Soldiers.

                Correct… and notably, unlike the other forces around them (Syrian dictatorship, Turkish-sponsored islamists, ISIS, etc) they responded to the accusation within a month:

                In June 2020, United Nations reported the YPG/YPJ as the largest faction in the Syrian civil war by the number of recruited child soldiers with 283 child soldiers followed by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham with 245 child soldiers.[141]

                On 15 July 2020, SDF issued a new military order prohibiting child recruitment. The NGO Fight For Humanity conducted multiple training sessions with hundreds of SDF commanders about the UN-SDF Action Plan To Prevent Child Recruitment, and distributed informational posters and flyers about it written in both Arabic and Kurdish, as part of an ongoing educational process. Syria-based researcher Thomas McClure observed that “SDF are less likely to engage in such practices than any of the other forces in Syria, but seek to hold themselves to a higher standard of accountability and human rights.”[142]

                On 29 August 2020, SDF announced the creation of a new system that anyone can use to confidentially report to specialized Child Protection offices any suspected case of child recruitment, in accordance with the action plan that the SDF signed with the United Nations in the summer of 2019.[143][144]

          • BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            What’s your plan to “remove those incentives” because think we’ve got more than enough sample data on what happens when a government falls and the disappearance of all crime and hostility is not part of it.

            Are you the one that said not to say “go read theory”? Because the urge to tell you to go read theory is pretty fuckin strong. I’m not going to summarize 200 years of political philosophy and history for you. Especially because I know you’re just gonna go “no you’re wrong and my heirarchical realism is right” no matter how compelling my points are. I’ll give you a couple of places to start, I guess.

            Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution. E-book/PDF version. Audiobook version.

            Anarchy Works, Peter Gelderloos. PDF/E-book version Audiobook version

            Seeing Like a State, James C. Scott, pdf version

            An Anarchist FAQ

            On YouTube: Anark (Theory essays), Andrewism (Theory and Praxis), Zoe Baker (PhD in anarchist history).

            Also, the Spanish revolution is a lot more complicated than “the fascists won btw”. Your tone again suggests it’s not worth the effort of breaking it down for.you. I don’t have any specific recommendations on that other than to open a book. Have a good day and go fuck yourself