• owl@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    27 days ago

    These standing seats have been coming next year for the past decade, but they always failed safety tests. Planes need to be evacuated within a certain time frame, which does not work when the plane is too densely packed.

    • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      27 days ago

      Did the stronger younger people try pushing the frail and children out of the way during these safety tests? Because I feel like the plane world empty quickly in that scenario

      • owl@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        “Do you feel capable of opening the exit in case of an emergency?”
        – Yes.
        “Do you feel capable of throwing the old woman behind you of of the window in case of an emergency?”
        – What?
        “Do you know how to punch someone unconscious if they fall to hysteria in case of an emergency?”
        – I would like to leave the plane now.

    • Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      I think we should relax rules on how quickly it is to evaluate a plane, and focus more on keeping the plane in the sky. (looking at you Boeing)

      I’d love sleeping pods or bunk beds on a plane and accept the higher risk of not being able to get out quickly.

      Cars and probably even train are infinitely more dangerous and we accept those risks every day.

      • owl@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        26 days ago

        I don’t think loosening regulations in one place will help in other places.

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        27 days ago

        There is no legitimate reason why trains or cars should be more dangerous modes of transport than flights. It is just that the lobbies for cars and capitalist train operations successfully desensitized everyone to it, so “deadly car crash” is just shrugged away. In the US we see similar attempts to make planes less safe and just accept the numbers of people killed in preventable events.

        • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          IDK about trains, but the problem with cars is that we let people operate them with minimal training and practically no oversight. You see shit on roads daily where if the driver was flying a plane, they wouldn’t even be let on as a passenger anymore ever.

          • Saleh@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            27 days ago

            We could increase the training requirements and oversight. We could design road-networks in a way that makes speeding more difficult and enact stricter speed limits.

            Whenever these measures are taking in an area they greatly reduce the number of people killed or seriously injured.

      • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        And if we are making rules about exiting a plane it should apply to when the plane lands normally. There is absolutely no reason it takes 30+ mints to get the fuck off the plane once we’ve arrived at the gate

        • friendlymessage@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          That would mean getting rid of carry-on and deploying emergency chutes every time which costs 10s of thousands to replace each time and grounds the plane for weeks. Makes sense.