• judgyweevil@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Next: registration plate for every pedestrian to attach on the back side, and mandatory insurance

    • gian @lemmy.grys.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      That would be stupid, but that a bicyclists use a high visibility jacket is not, too many time on the road (in Italy, but I suppose everywhere else) you cross bicyclists at night or late evening that are basically invisible until the last moment: no light, wear black clothes (and often in the wrong direction).

      True, maybe also the road should be better illuminated, but that a bicyclists make himself visible is not a stupid idea.

      • Localhorst86@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        basically invisible until the last moment: no light, wear black clothes (and often in the wrong direction)

        I am unfamiliar with rules regarding traffic-worthiness of a bicycle, but in germany, your bike requires certain equipment to be fitted to the bike - reflectors on the spokes, front and rear light at night, etc. Additionally, you’re not allowed to drive in the wrong direction, unless specifically allowed to with a street sign (one-way-streets often allow for ciclysts to drive against the direction)

        If those rules don’t exist in a similar fashion in italy: consider making the bike traffic worthy before forcing ciclysts into high-viz-gear and therefore reduce their willingness to actually use a bike in the first place.

        If those rules do exist in a similar fashion already: cyclists are apparently not following those rules, adding another rule for high-viz-gear is most likely not going to be followed either. Maybe consider enforcing the existing rules before adding another rule.