• Thorry@feddit.org
    41·
    23 days ago

    No? Why would that make it legal?

    You could argue jurisprudence, but that would mean there had to be an actual ruling in the past. There wasn’t so it isn’t relevant.

    The whole argument is like a small child’s defense of “He did it first!”. This is the real grown-up world we are talking about, not some schoolground.

    • Redkid1324@lemmy.world
      31·
      23 days ago

      Well yes and no if you are pissed at trump for doing it you have to be equally pissed at Obama

      • Thorry@feddit.org
        22·
        23 days ago

        And that would be what we call a what aboutism and false equivalency fallacy.

        Go away troll

        • Redkid1324@lemmy.world
          21·
          23 days ago

          False equivalency huh?

          How can you have a moral conversation or opinion about something when your morals are skewed to begin with and you won’t recognize that.