• MrScruff@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Whoever wrote this is pretty silly. They’re assuming 5% of GDP goes towards making guns. That is not the case. 1.5% of that can be spent on things like infrastructure and cyber security. Which isn’t (necessarily) going to be stripping money away from other spending.

    The traditional defense spending budget is only raising to 3.5%.

    • solo@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t think I understand why you say that the author is assuming 5% of GDP goes towards making guns, since they talk throughout the article about military expenditure and military spending, which are much broader terms.

    • rumimevlevi@lemmings.worldBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      They are cutting public service and supports to population to increase “defense” spending. Like the uk trying to cut disability benefits