You must log in or # to comment.
Whoever wrote this is pretty silly. They’re assuming 5% of GDP goes towards making guns. That is not the case. 1.5% of that can be spent on things like infrastructure and cyber security. Which isn’t (necessarily) going to be stripping money away from other spending.
The traditional defense spending budget is only raising to 3.5%.
I don’t think I understand why you say that the author is assuming 5% of GDP goes towards making guns, since they talk throughout the article about military expenditure and military spending, which are much broader terms.
They are cutting public service and supports to population to increase “defense” spending. Like the uk trying to cut disability benefits