Drew@sopuli.xyzM to LinkedinLunatics@sh.itjust.works · 23 days agoWhat could this formula be?sopuli.xyzimagemessage-square32linkfedilinkarrow-up1121arrow-down10
arrow-up1121arrow-down1imageWhat could this formula be?sopuli.xyzDrew@sopuli.xyzM to LinkedinLunatics@sh.itjust.works · 23 days agomessage-square32linkfedilink
minus-squarefckreddit@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up8·23 days agoYeah. Because screw laws of thermodynamics, am I right?
minus-squareLittle8Lost@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·23 days agoAs long as AI = 0 it works
minus-squarefckreddit@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up8·23 days agoUnfortunately, AI is currently negative, as in it makes things worse.
minus-squarefckreddit@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·23 days agoTrue. One cannot expect statistical parrots to be intelligent, no matter how sophisticated they are.
Yeah. Because screw laws of thermodynamics, am I right?
As long as AI = 0 it works
Unfortunately, AI is currently negative, as in it makes things worse.
I is 0, as it is nonexistent
True. One cannot expect statistical parrots to be intelligent, no matter how sophisticated they are.