• TronBronson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Okay, well let me help you understand what limited liability limits: Your personal assets. Thats it dude, it means your debtors cant go after your personal house. It doesn’t say your company can commit wage theft and no one’s legally responsible. I would be selling crack under an LLC to your mother if i could.

    The reason why you’re confused and why i was attacking you is you vomited up a bunch of words that didnt make sense and it hurt my brain. The point we’re all making is wage theft is a crime, not a bad obligation. you’re protected from obligations not legal threat lol. You can absolutely be targeted and prosecuted for the company you oversee committing crimes. So what we’re all saying is we’d like to see more of that and much harsher penalties, to prevent companies from exploiting power imbalances and stealing large sums of money???

    • 0xDREADBEEF@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      sorry bro unless you have read marx and hegel you have nothing new for me. not reading your comment. im sorry or i hope things go okay for you or whatever you said

      • TronBronson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Bro you’re not even old enough to remember a duke nukem game gtfoh with that use something from your own generation.

        • 0xDREADBEEF@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I played duke nukem 3d in like 1999 with some kind of joystick on my cousins computer. Nice try, though. The meme is hilarious so I use it whenever I find it useful. I like the younger generations and appreciate their humor.

          • TronBronson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            well look who learned to read. Now why dont you read up on limited liability before you make yourself look like a moron online again!

              • TronBronson@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                How would limited liability punish CEOs? You realize thats the government and the courts job right? It’s a failure for the legislators who wrote the laws. did you vote last year or are you still waiting for your balls to drop?

                • 0xDREADBEEF@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  It’s mere existence stands in the way of being able to effectively punish CEOs in the way they should be in a just world. We don’t live in a just world, which is why we have limited liability protections. To limit liability they otherwise would have as an individual.

                  • TronBronson@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    Did you read the part where limited liability refers to financial liabilities and personal assets or are you going to keep ignoring and that arguing this imaginary concept in your head like a REAL MAGA PATRIOT. Limited liability has nothing to do with the US governments inability to prosecute. It’s litterally just a layer of bankruptcy protection. FFS