cm0002@lemmy.world to Nintendo@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 days agoThe Switch 2's super sluggish LCD screen is 10 times slower than a typical gaming monitor and 100 times slower than an OLED panel according to independent testingwww.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square36linkfedilinkarrow-up1186arrow-down19cross-posted to: gadgets@lemmit.onlinetechnology@lemmit.onlinegaming@lemmy.worldpcgamer@rss.ponder.cat
arrow-up1177arrow-down1external-linkThe Switch 2's super sluggish LCD screen is 10 times slower than a typical gaming monitor and 100 times slower than an OLED panel according to independent testingwww.pcgamer.comcm0002@lemmy.world to Nintendo@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 days agomessage-square36linkfedilinkcross-posted to: gadgets@lemmit.onlinetechnology@lemmit.onlinegaming@lemmy.worldpcgamer@rss.ponder.cat
minus-squarePonyOfWar@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24arrow-down1·edit-210 days ago Japan’s Chimolog is our second source. Its tests showed the Switch 2’s display to be slightly quicker, averaging 17 ms at 60 Hz. That’s quite a huge difference though, about half that of Monitors Unboxed. Would definitely be worth finding out why the results are so different.
minus-squarePhelpssan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·edit-210 days agoNintendo probably uses more than one screen manufacturer.
minus-squarePonyOfWar@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down2·edit-210 days agoYeah, could be that or the testing methods of either site might have been flawed. In any case the difference shouldn’t just be brushed aside like it was in the article.
That’s quite a huge difference though, about half that of Monitors Unboxed. Would definitely be worth finding out why the results are so different.
Nintendo probably uses more than one screen manufacturer.
Yeah, could be that or the testing methods of either site might have been flawed. In any case the difference shouldn’t just be brushed aside like it was in the article.