The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Gaming@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoThis seems like a bad long-term strategylemmy.worldimagemessage-square85linkfedilinkarrow-up11.35Karrow-down14 cross-posted to: lemmydirectory@lemmy.dbzer0.comlemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
arrow-up11.35Karrow-down1imageThis seems like a bad long-term strategylemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Gaming@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square85linkfedilink cross-posted to: lemmydirectory@lemmy.dbzer0.comlemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
minus-squareliking625@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up45·2 months agoOnly a single rule is needed. If mass layoffs need to happen, the top person responsible, the CEO, must also leave the company in the same fashion.
minus-squarefeannag@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up46·2 months agoWithout a golden parachute.
minus-squarecosmos8188@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·2 months ago…B…b.ut the yacht can stay. Right?? Some bilionare
minus-squarekablez@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22arrow-down1·2 months agoWhat about a trial by combat clause? CEO has to fight one representative of the workforce. In America this could be a whole new genre of reality tv! We could call it… Luigi’s Mansion.
Only a single rule is needed. If mass layoffs need to happen, the top person responsible, the CEO, must also leave the company in the same fashion.
Without a golden parachute.
…B…b.ut the yacht can stay. Right??
What about a trial by combat clause? CEO has to fight one representative of the workforce. In America this could be a whole new genre of reality tv! We could call it… Luigi’s Mansion.