Clothes washer sold in the US and Canada. Notable for

  1. The casual assumption that it would be women doing the washing, and,

  2. The lax payment schedule. “If you want it, pay a little each week, or a little each month. No hurry; just suit yourself.”

  • mossy_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    20 days ago

    this policy sounds like a logistical nightmare. give these washers out to people, then follow up and collect it for free? or collect unstructured payments from everyone who borrowed one? I can’t imagine

    • EnmebaraGuesser@piefed.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      20 days ago

      Doesn’t it though! I could see a tiny local business run like that where you do business on a handshake. But this was a multi-national business with product shipped out of NYC and Toronto. The customer might be in like California or Saskatchewan. Eh, just send us some money once in a while if you keep it more than 30 days.

  • EnmebaraGuesser@piefed.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    Found photo of surviving one.

    These apparently became motorized around 1920, so the ad must be before that.

    Model 1900 gravity washer

  • Abyssian@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    20 days ago

    That casual assumption was nearly universal. Read some very early scifi, if they include female characters at all there are always lines like “Tina, you’re a woman, you could never manage to (do things that matter).”

    My favorite part of this ad is describing it as a “Gravity” washer and all the manual work you no longer need to do with the implications that some new science and gravity is doing the work… then the image with that nice big hand crank.

    Gravity’s only job is keeping things in the bucket.

    • EnmebaraGuesser@piefed.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      20 days ago

      the image with that nice big hand crank.

      I had the same thought. Although to be fair to the ad copy, from what I have read, devices like this were a major improvement on the labor of using a washboard. You still had to supply muscle power, but it was less labor intensive overall and much faster.

      That casual assumption was nearly universal

      Oh for sure. Big occupational segregation at the time, so the ad wasn’t even wrong per se, in its historical context. It would have indeed been exceedingly more likely.

      • Abyssian@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 days ago

        I guess to be fair it is also a big step up from the Anti-Gravity washer they released before this one to show off crazy new advances in science. Trying to hold all the water and clothes so they don’t float off while turning that crank cost a lot of women their fingers.

    • titter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 days ago

      It had a false bottom in the tub, where gravity could pull debris and filth down into under your clothing as you use the handle on the side of the tub to rotate it back and for like the auger in a modern upright washing machine.

      Tbh i would still use this today…before i got my washer and dryer i used a bucket and a spinning mop dryer to wash most of my clothes for about three years, and a laundromat to wash things bigger than a t shirt. I dreamed of having a wash basin with a drain (dont have to lift and dump, just pull a plug!) and omg a wringer!

      They motorized this later on but leaks from the basin would cause it to short sometimes which was, of course, dangerous.

      It also looks like the false bottom doesn’t rotate, just the basin, so the claims that the water moves and not your clothing is fairly stated!

  • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    19 days ago
    1. We just send it to you, use it 30d and then pay or send back.

    Very notable I’d argue. That would indeed compell me to try it, if they are THAT confident of their product. Noone does that today anymore, as items often don’t even make it 30 days 😒