Okay, so here’s what I think is wrong with this graphic that suggests it’s AI: If it was created person they’d likely start this by writing the sentence “Ordinary Russians Are Not To Blame For The War” in the same font using the same styling for each word and then you’d edit it to say “Ordinary Russians Are!! Not To Blame For The War”. with some red ink for the edits. The version presented here inserts the “Are” part in fake red handwriting, which doesn’t make sense if the whole idea is that they’re starting from the first version of the sentence and changing it with the red ink for emphasis. So to me that feels like an error that an AI would make.
Tbh this may be slop but its not AI, the small details all look correct and yes in theory they could have used an extremely advanced model but lets be honest they wouldn’t spend that much for something like this
Hey cool, you can tell this is AI slop because of “ARE!!
Not”What?
Okay, so here’s what I think is wrong with this graphic that suggests it’s AI: If it was created person they’d likely start this by writing the sentence “Ordinary Russians Are Not To Blame For The War” in the same font using the same styling for each word and then you’d edit it to say “Ordinary Russians Are!!
NotTo Blame For The War”. with some red ink for the edits. The version presented here inserts the “Are” part in fake red handwriting, which doesn’t make sense if the whole idea is that they’re starting from the first version of the sentence and changing it with the red ink for emphasis. So to me that feels like an error that an AI would make.Tbh this may be slop but its not AI, the small details all look correct and yes in theory they could have used an extremely advanced model but lets be honest they wouldn’t spend that much for something like this