The rule is part of the EU's broader artificial intelligence law, which is being rolled out in phases. This first step focuses on disclosure. If content is...
This exception covers like 100% of all use cases yeah. The goal is probably to hinder its use for political campaigns, but you can just claim its satire and if they sue it will take years at which point the damage is done.
In that case it might also be helpful for things like false advertising too, which landlords have been doing to make their neglected properties look better than they actually are.
“It’s just a joke brah! I don’t have to label it!”
I struggle to understand why they would create such a gigantic caveat that undermines the entire law unless the goal is to undermine it.
unfuckingbelievable
This exception covers like 100% of all use cases yeah. The goal is probably to hinder its use for political campaigns, but you can just claim its satire and if they sue it will take years at which point the damage is done.
In that case it might also be helpful for things like false advertising too, which landlords have been doing to make their neglected properties look better than they actually are.
“it was artistic rendering of property”
Can’t you disobey every law and force the state to sue you?
Well yeah, but if you dont have lots of money, you will go bankrupt.
How in the fuck did “creative” end up in that list 😭