dude@lemmings.worldM to news@lemmings.worldEnglish · 3 days agoTrump suggests quitting as president and making ‘hosting a full time job’ as he gushes over his Kennedy Center performancewww.independent.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square32linkfedilinkarrow-up1126arrow-down16cross-posted to: nottheonion@lemmy.world
arrow-up1120arrow-down1external-linkTrump suggests quitting as president and making ‘hosting a full time job’ as he gushes over his Kennedy Center performancewww.independent.co.ukdude@lemmings.worldM to news@lemmings.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square32linkfedilinkcross-posted to: nottheonion@lemmy.world
minus-squareTheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up37·3 days agoHe is going to retire, and then he will run for a third term because he never completed his second term.
minus-square😈MedicPig🐷BabySaver😈@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down1·3 days agoHe can’t legally run for another term.
minus-squareUnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up34arrow-down3·3 days ago“Uh, excuse me, Mr. President, uh… sir. I’m afraid what you’re doing is… er… illegal and I will have to politely request that you cease and desist immediately.”
minus-squarelIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·3 days agoThey can’t risk any electoral votes - do you think they’d want to risk running a candidate who is ineligible for x number of them? This isn’t about “asking him to stop” (which I think was the point of your comment?) but rather the EC
minus-squarea_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·3 days agoSupreme Court: We gonna allow it.
He is going to retire, and then he will run for a third term because he never completed his second term.
He can’t legally run for another term.
“Uh, excuse me, Mr. President, uh… sir. I’m afraid what you’re doing is… er… illegal and I will have to politely request that you cease and desist immediately.”
They can’t risk any electoral votes - do you think they’d want to risk running a candidate who is ineligible for x number of them?
This isn’t about “asking him to stop” (which I think was the point of your comment?) but rather the EC
Supreme Court: We gonna allow it.
…and…