New dating for White Sands footprints confirms controversial theory

arstechnica.com

New dating for White Sands footprints confirms controversial theory

arstechnica.com

RSS Bot@lemmy.bestiver.seMB to Hacker News@lemmy.bestiver.seEnglish · 2 months ago

Results are consistent with two earlier studies dating the footprints to between 22,000 and 24,000 years ago.

Comments

You must log in or # to comment.

Chat

Hacker News@lemmy.bestiver.se

hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se

Community locked: only moderators can create posts. You can still comment on posts.

Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.

The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

47 users / day
220 users / week
753 users / month
1.26K users / 6 months
0 local subscribers
2.27K subscribers
6.1K Posts
2.87K Comments
Modlog