@perchance , or any other authority on the site that can fulfill my request I am
filing an URGENT demand for immediate intervention and total domain deactivation
/ deletion, or the removal of comments regarding the subdomains
perchance.org/ai-chat [http://perchance.org/ai-chat]. This platform is actively
facilitating systemic child sexual exploitation, the distribution of child
sexual abuse material (CSAM) of infants and more, severe extortion, and
predatory behaviors targeting minors. The comment sections and user-generated
outputs within these specific generators contain explicit logs of extremely
questionable fantasies, infant abuse references, and real-world predator
behaviors. Internal moderation on this site is entirely absent and
non-functional, leaving a large population of underage users completely exposed
to dangerous individuals without any active safety oversight or intervention. We
already have a case with the NCMEC The case ID is the following: 247751090 A few
witness testimonies can be found here:
user.uploads.dev/file/39f28b26b589b5433cd06e96e3627702.jpg
user.uploads.dev/file/ef0d4fde2ca95bb780e62c42211ed3cf.jpg
user.uploads.dev/file/89bd8506a429c11a2b48e6477c67794a.jpg
user.uploads.dev/file/95659ff95687040c60334ad81674249d.jpg
user.uploads.dev/file/308738d9af319653b9738e402e11a98a.jpg Please, remove the
comments of the site; or the site itself immediately to prevent further illegal
activity! Thank you
This again, isn’t the first time I’ve mentioned this ; given the severity of the activity, and the evidence I’ve provided, why hasn’t there been any action
How the Law Sees It: Under established internet law, a platform is not required to prevent every single bad thing from happening in real-time. It is required to provide a mechanism for users to report abuse and a process to remove illegal content once they are made aware of it.
Good Samaritan Protections: Under Section 230, platforms are actually encouraged to use automated filters and community reporting. The law protects developers who make a “good faith” effort to moderate their platforms, even if some bad content occasionally slips through the automated cracks.
Nothing has been, that’s the issue. Someone literally leaked their trafficking profile on Telegram, on there; and absolutely nothing has been done. People still, actively distribute said materials and nothing has been done. “Not reporting everything” implies there’s been some for, of actual active effective moderation, where there has not
S-230 is nullified under both negligence and the distribution of CSM, I explained this in the prior thread
How the Law Sees It: Under established internet law, a platform is not required to prevent every single bad thing from happening in real-time. It is required to provide a mechanism for users to report abuse and a process to remove illegal content once they are made aware of it.
Good Samaritan Protections: Under Section 230, platforms are actually encouraged to use automated filters and community reporting. The law protects developers who make a “good faith” effort to moderate their platforms, even if some bad content occasionally slips through the automated cracks.
Nothing has been, that’s the issue. Someone literally leaked their trafficking profile on Telegram, on there; and absolutely nothing has been done. People still, actively distribute said materials and nothing has been done. “Not reporting everything” implies there’s been some for, of actual active effective moderation, where there has not
S-230 is nullified under both negligence and the distribution of CSM, I explained this in the prior thread