alessandro@lemmy.ca to PC Gaming@lemmy.caEnglish · 2 days agoRockstar co-founder [Dan Houser] compares AI to 'mad cow disease,' and says the execs pushing it aren't 'fully-rounded humans'www.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square117linkfedilinkarrow-up1835arrow-down15cross-posted to: pcgamer@ibbit.attechnology@lemmit.online
arrow-up1830arrow-down1external-linkRockstar co-founder [Dan Houser] compares AI to 'mad cow disease,' and says the execs pushing it aren't 'fully-rounded humans'www.pcgamer.comalessandro@lemmy.ca to PC Gaming@lemmy.caEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square117linkfedilinkcross-posted to: pcgamer@ibbit.attechnology@lemmit.online
minus-squareCileTheSane@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 day agoCorrect, and trying to get clarification as to what you claim the problem is is yielding no results, so I have to assume it’s non-existant.
minus-square__反いじめ戦隊@ani.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down5·1 day agoWait, are you not aware what fallacy you are committing?
minus-squareCileTheSane@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 day agoStrawman is arguing against a different argument than the one you are presenting. I’m saying you’re not presenting an argument at all.
minus-square__反いじめ戦隊@ani.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·23 hours agoCool. My argument is Dan Houser exploited employees when he worked at RGS.
minus-squareCileTheSane@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-219 hours ago That’s a statement, not an argument. If you’re going to start citing fallacies then I’m going to start expecting properly formed arguments. That statement seems to be based exclusively on him being a union buster, despite the union busting happening 5 years after he left.
minus-square__反いじめ戦隊@ani.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·13 hours agoReread my first post.
minus-squareCileTheSane@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 hours ago So he’s going to rehire the visa dependent labourers RG fired? That’s neither a statement nor an argument, and is complete nonsense.
Correct, and trying to get clarification as to what you claim the problem is is yielding no results, so I have to assume it’s non-existant.
Wait, are you not aware what fallacy you are committing?
Strawman is arguing against a different argument than the one you are presenting.
I’m saying you’re not presenting an argument at all.
Cool. My argument is Dan Houser exploited employees when he worked at RGS.
That’s a statement, not an argument. If you’re going to start citing fallacies then I’m going to start expecting properly formed arguments.
That statement seems to be based exclusively on him being a union buster, despite the union busting happening 5 years after he left.
Reread my first post.
That’s neither a statement nor an argument, and is complete nonsense.