depends on how many taxes were collected to pay for it.

Again… nobody that has the ability to create currency out of thin air requires your taxes to pay for anything.

Did you really think the US military is funded through taxes? No. That’s a liberal myth. The US government invents the money and simply hands it to the military-industrial complex. All that luxurious funding used to slaughter brown people all over the world doesn’t cause inflation because of your taxes. You can see this perfectly clearly in (supposedly) “socialist” states in Europe - the Danish government decides to spend more on healthcare and adjusts the taxes to prevent inflation… which Danish people are happy to pay, of course, because they get something out of it (surprisingly, slaughtering brown people all over the world doesn’t seem to get USians anything)

Delete Facebook/Instagram.

This is actually a terrible idea - which I unfortunately used to ascribe to. Turns out that now all communications regarding the town I live in only happens through Facebook and WhatsApp - so when we get extended water and electricity cuts, guess who gets to be left out of the loop?

All the “clever” people who deleted Facebook and WhatsApp - that’s who.

Would I hit a guy with meta glasses, you ask?

No, of course not… I’d hit him with a baseball bat instead.

Taxes are just payment for the stuff the government does.

Not really - no government needs us to pay for stuff. After all, they literally just create the stuff out of thin air. It’s our labour that they require.

Taxes is mostly just how governments delete money from the economy.

And the implied “If you fight against this you must want to abuse kids

That is childishly easy to counter by pointing out who it is that children really need protection from,, but nobody in our bootlicker media or lapdog political institutions wants to to do that because they are all in favour of clamping down on internet freedom…

No surprises there.

So they weren’t already doing that?

That would be funny.

How in any way shape or form does this do anything to protect children?

It doesn’t. That was never the intention, it was purely pretext.

Boo fucking hoo.

Good tip. Remember, folks… don’t threaten him - just make sure you aim properly next time.

will exacerbate harms they are trying to prevent &

Why the pretense that this has anything to do with “harms” to children?

I use the term “public infrastructure” and gallows is the first thing that pops into your mind?

Geez.

You don’t understand… her shitstain of a husband was offed by a white person - that means it doesn’t register as violence to white supremacists. It’s just “boys being boys.”

Ahhh… this is what happens when you leave sex-ed in the hands of people like Ben Shapiro.

Since when does “half of leftist ideologies” fetishise private ownership over the means of production?

Liberal propagandists love this whole “tax the rich” horseshit because they, like the billionaire parasites they truly represent, know perfectly well that taxing them a slight bit more (which would be a best case scenario) poses absolutely zero threat to their private ownership over the means of production.

You don’t beat billionaire parasites through taxation - you beat them through public infrastructure.

Do tell, liberal - is it your own right-wing ideology you do not understand? Or is it that you understand neither your own ideology or anything that can be called leftist with a straight face?

Or is it a question of both?

Nobody on the left gives a flying fuck about “taxing the rich.”

That’s a purely liberal pretend-solution.

Only if you try to swallow them whole.