I think the person you’re replying to was just pissed off that you were being obtuse about this being a rape joke. It is very clearly a rape joke.

Oh damn that actually sounds pretty good!

Yeah I know it’s my opinion, that’ll be why I said “I feel” and “I think”.

Not gonna read about how you use your bs chatbot, I don’t care 🤷‍♂️

They look SO good! How did ya make them? 👀 What’re you gonna put in them?

The Pedo Prince is still not in prison though is he

I don’t want to use LLMs. I feel the majority of use cases for LLMs are inauthentic, lazy, unhelpful, and uncreative.

It feels like I’ve said “fizzy drinks are bad” and you’ve told me to drink diet sodas.

I understand that dbzero is a pro-AI instance, so I think we’re just fundamentally not going to agree on this. 🤷‍♂️

I’m saying don’t use unethical tech. If you want to interpret that as sticking your head in the sand, you can, but I think you’re being obtuse.

Unless you’re advocating that we go and burn down the infrastructure that runs these LLMs - is that what you’re saying?

I don’t know why backing down after massive backlash is being lauded if I’m being completely honest. I want to replace them because the decision in the first place to pollute Wikipedia at all with AI is so poor that I no longer trust them to make good choices.

I get that I’m being pigheaded, but unfortunately I don’t trust that it was done out of some purely good intention and naivety. Even if that was the case, then the people making that decision are gullible enough to fall for LLM hype and too irresponsible to be in charge of something that we both agree is an absolute marvel of our modern age, and a massive collaborative effort contributed to by so many hundreds of thousands of people, and used by so many millions more.

I totally understand that I’m being stubborn, but this isn’t a principle I’m willing to compromise on in this case!

Oh, I see. Yeah that’s fair, the guy’s a fucking lunatic.

Am I being dense here? I thought this was just medical info, not like… Anything weird or sexual (in a non-medical sense)?

I’m not saying he’s correct, and I certainly loathe the brain-worm ridden freak, but saying it’s “not appropriate” for the Secretary of Health to know if something concerning is happening with sperm count seems a bit hyperbolic.

Honestly, I don’t know. I stopped listening after they said they were going to.

Too little too late for me really; unless they replace the people who made that decision in the first place, that sort of anti-human, lazy, irresponsible sentiment will remain present in their leadership.

Oh true, lemme just saddle up and fix the US economy myself 👍

I cancelled my donations to wikipedia since the WMF announced they’d be using AI, and they gave me a really milquetoast bullshit response when I emailed them. Can’t trust such a precious, collaborative, human effort as Wikipedia to a bunch of anti-human robofuckers. 🤷‍♂️

Ew Jesus Christ can we get some kind of blur on pictures of this absolute meathead? It’s like getting flashbanged when this leering simian head pops into my feed 😂

Anyway, whatever this dipshit is saying, she’s a racist, the loudest moron in the room, and a Christian nationalist. Fuck that. She’s still the enemy.

Do not engage with chatbots at all. Let this LLM psychosis end. That’s the best result for humanity.

To be honest, I think the punchline is “bad person we don’t like gets hurt.” In this particular telling, the bad person is incidentally a woman, but the joke seemingly has varying characters as mentioned by another commenter below.

Internet’s dead folks, time to get back to the real world! 🥳

Marketers ruin everything. Marketers are liars. I’ve worked with marketing departments in every job I’ve ever had, and they’re scum every time. Social media obsessed weirdos who can’t do anything honest and authentic. Freaks.

We’re fucked. No point being scared of something we have no control over. A few rich men will come out of this ahead, and the rest of us will fight over the scraps, lose our homes, and starve. 🤷‍♂️