real G’s use ed

What in the flying fuck? If a service makes me calculate how much it costs for any given fixed amount of time then I’m not even considering it and move on.

I stopped putting my handle on public spaces because I got invited to spam chats and shady scam stuff.

I’m not a programmer but using hsl() seems so much easier and intuitive but only once you remember the hue of typical colors. Setting shades from another colours is also easy peasy with variables.

Obviously still setting a background to red/green (named) to test if a selector is correct and general testing.

stop calling your little iguana an alligator.

I’ll show you how to install Archlinux

I second this

I vote 2

Thank you for sharing this

Its all fun and games when your bork a custom rom, force flash a stock rom and delete your EFS directory (the one with the IMEI)

Ah good times, now that phone is just my OBS controller.

I recommend Revolt for the ones looking for alternatives

racism? against whom?

Not mad, the comment was not adding anything of value in my opinion because it was not clear what it meant. So the down vote is for “this comment is not useful and perhaps lazy”. I also upvote things which I do not agree with but they are proposed in a civil manner, and when I’m proven wrong I say " thanks for letting me know this". So… This is not personal.

And I never claimed that anything (post, comment or whatever) needed words to have meaning. Not sure what your point is though…

someone, not all, that is the point.

fair

This is about some people no being able to comprehend anything from the posts beside from symbols. This could be in the most obscure of languages and any person with a brain that knows memes can understand the basic idea. I’m just saying the verbal part in the post is not comprehensible to all people, which happens to break the rule 5.

I do not care what language it is on, Spanish is my native language, I just want everyone to able to read and understand.

gracias capitán obvio

Well it is true one can deduce the gist of it, but not the exact message. So I guess the rule has to be clearer on this.

It is not, this post breaks rule 5.