

Yes… buuuut they forward that cost to the consumers. The buisneses dont go:“Wops, we need to pay more for items, lets keep the prices the same for the consumers.” They increse the cost for the consumers.


Yes… buuuut they forward that cost to the consumers. The buisneses dont go:“Wops, we need to pay more for items, lets keep the prices the same for the consumers.” They increse the cost for the consumers.
Slut(a) nu ! ;p
Lol. That would be funny.
TLDR; Thank you! It’s alcohol based markers not watercolour.
Thanks, appreciate it! But fyi it’s not watercolour but alcohol markers. Main reason is thats its easier (for me atleast) to get richer colours with em (plus there is less buckling of the page). It is a similair principle though, layers and layers from light to dark with sometimes usinf “wett on wett” or “wett on dry”, and a lot if blending. But yes watercolour can be absolutley amazing i just lack the skill/interest in it.
Lol ye. Dyskexia + being a bit of a idiot is one hell of a drug. Did not even have any amnisack when i wrote it
That looks bloody brilliant!


Thank you! Glad to hear/read!


Thank you! I recently got back into it after not realy drawing for a while! So nice to hear i still got it :)


Merci!


Thank you!


Thanks! :)
I get what you mean, i think my point is more regarding who the sufferinf party is.
The customer is the end “sufferer”. So should have the repirations. This is a wierd metaphot but hear me out. Lets say someone tries to shoot me. I dodge it and someone behinds me gets shot. A judge ordera the shooter to pay for the medical bills. Would it be fair for me to get that money? Or should it go to the person who got shot? Yes maybe i deserve some compensation. But compleatly ignoring the person who got shot feels wrong no?