In Poland we have this anecdote explaining traditions.

Whenever I make boiled pork knuckle I cut it in half, because that’s how my Mom taught me. I didn’t know the reason, so I asked her about it: “Oh, I do it because that’s what your Granny did. It’s tradition.”. I went to Granny and asked the same: “Your Great grandmother did so, and so I do too. It’s tradition”.

I went to GG, and her answer was “I had a small pot”. That’s what tradition is.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women's_fear_of_crime

Women fear is reverse correlated to likelihood of it happening (lower chance = more feared)

Some studies suggest a fucked up reasoning behind it: “if rape is rare, then they [women] feel more disgust to victims of the rape than if it was common”.

Some scholars tie that reverse correlation to perceived lowering of social standing and attractiveness (as in the victims of crime stand out negatively compared to other gals). (Tbh this makes more sense).

(And other reasons but those two are most likely to have people click on the Wiki article to read more)

What do you need that penis for? Rape or worse?

Which is illegal?

Makes sense someone removed it

Here we are.

You couldn’t have make more stupid argument.

And you did utilize the fruits you had, but there never was an abundance of them like for example in medieval Italy.

Yes. Historically British Isles had meh climate for fruit production. You could either forage for berries, but fruits were mostly seasonal apples or pears or plums, but the harvest seasons were rather short.

And if you were to say, for example, that pasta with tomato sauce is an Italian dish, I’d argue it’s not, as pasta was eaten across the whole Europe, and likely first added tomato happened in Britain.

Bolognese sauce with pasta on the other hand would definitely be Italian dish. Do you see the distinction?

Fair.

Polish rosół is much more similar to French consomme than to ramen though. The stretch to ramen would be rather significant.

I mean even scrambled eggs is too much for any Italian hotel or breakfast restaurant I’ve been to. Like literally as if they made it mediocre on purpose.

They make good meat dishes (roasts, meat pies), but then they pair them with the most uninspiring sides…

I mean… British were always shafted by their nobility. The land wasn’t known for fruits or sweet veggies, the rent in UK paid to the landlord was relatively high, so most peasants ate pickles, chutneys or different mushed veggies as sides.

But has British food historically been good? No, it has not.

Oh boy. You should Google that, because you couldn’t be more wrong.

Edit:

Example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Forme_of_Cury XIV century cookbook. Damn, oldest known recipe for macaroni and cheese comes from it.

XIV - XV century whole Europe was jelly for English cuisine.

XVI you were the capital of pastries and sweets.

Well, turns out that for the past few hundred years men cooks were only the talented ones or those that had interest, while for women it was not a choice.

Out of the food you mentioned only Beef Wellington and English Breakfast/Ulster Fry/ are uniquely British.

Everything else is either not a dish (fried sausage and potatoes definitely is not a dish you philistine :P) or not distinct enough.

Pork pies, fish and chips, roast, shepherds pie - it is eaten in Britain, but is not unique to them, as was historically eaten across the whole Europe (I mean it is fish and chips, it didn’t need “inventing”).

Yeah, no, Italians can’t make breakfast for shit.

Coffee and a cake does not breakfast make.

No, this is done to ensure there’s no competition when selling games. Why do you think console games are pricier than PC ones? On PC we still have some competition.

Hi, could you share what phone you bought? I’m looking for a replacement in the near future and I want to get a headstart on the research.

Ummmm… According to YT, about 50% of new videos is AI generated (20% AI slop, 30% AI brainrot, don’t ask me whats the difference), and some industry analytics expect that to grow to 90%>

A debugger will always interfere with the processes you are looking at, hence making debugging of multithreading-related errors a game of whack-a-mole.

It’s a very pleasant debugging experience when you can easily switch threads, have them log what happened first, check the variables in the thread at the moment in time it was hit (vs now), etc. etc.

This and an easy way to attach a line-by-line debugger and I’m golden.

I believe that is a vast minority of developments. And tbh multithreading debugging is a breeze in C# on Rider (except race conditions, those will always be tricky, but also easily identifiable).

Huh? That is the literal opposite of what I said. Like, diametrically opposite.

The system summarizes and hashes docs. The model can only answer from those summaries in that mode. There’s no semantic retrieval step.

No, that’s exactly what you wrote.

Now, with this change

SUMM -> human reviews

That would be fixed, but will work only for small KBs, as otherwise the summary would be exhaustive.

Case in point: assume a Person model with 3-7 facts per Person. Assume small 3000 size set of Persons. How would the SUMM of work? Do you expect a human to verify that SUMM? How are you going to converse with your system to get the data from that KB Person set? Because to me that sounds like case C, only works for small KBs.

Again: the proposition is not “the model will never hallucinate.”. It’s “it can’t silently propagate hallucinations without a human explicitly allowing it to, and when it does, you trace it back to source version”.

Fair. Except that you are still left with the original problem of you don’t know WHEN the information is incorrect if you missed it at SUMM time.