Yeah I really hate the hypocritical Gabe worship. Like they actively give a pass to some blatantly anti competitive practices that steam has just because there few competitors that have attempted to enter the market had… Slightly fewer features than the entrenched monopoly platform that has had 20+ years to develop.

Government also denied having contact with Lee Harvey Oswald for decades… Until they stopped.

Yeah, using LLMs to do things that would be better suited to different machine learning models is a bad idea.

Pretty sure there are multiple complaints from different people about him.

And then, a few of the less dense ones realized that raw milk was dangerous and they could reduce the risk by… boiling it.

But they won’t drink pastuerized milk.

You’re the one saying we shouldn’t be cross comparing different numbers with different meanings… While literally comparing different numbers with different meanings to support your point

What morons did they ask? Holy shit.

Sure… But given that we’re discussing things in terms of US currency, the assumption is the US.

He’ll, you could fuck off into the woods and live on next to nothing in the US, too. But the standard of living is very different

…Who do you think gangs are recruiting? You know literally nothing about this topic, huh?

What is there to doubt? It’s right there in the text. LLMs are not data processing nor decision making models. There wouldn’t need to be a push to make the steps in LLM output more visible, like in other machine learning models

That’s not at all what this is doing. It’s a call to make sure businesses out a priority on making these machine learning models less opaque, so you can see the inputs it used, the connections it found at each step to be able to see why a result was given.

You can’t debug a black box (you put in into and get an unexplained output) remotely as easily, if at all

This sounds like they’re talking about machine learning models, not the glorified autocorrect LLMs. So the actually useful AI stuff that can be leveraged to do real, important things with large sets of data that would be much more difficult for humans to spot.

I doubt they’re impressed, just disdainful if you don’t have one.

Yeah we’re clearly talking about different things here. This dataset does not seem to differentiate between shootings that occurred between specific individuals with a grievance, while technically on school grounds, but likely both outside, and outside of normal school hours, likely gang and drug related, and individuals who choose to go Rambo on nonspecific or at least a large group of people within the school, during normal hours. Which are very different scenarios with very different motivations and potential remedies.

The problem is that’s not a sustainable withdrawal rate. Also it’s 10% average before factoring in inflation, so I’m real dollars it’s close to 7% on average, but some years are a negative return, where you’re eating into the principle, and require a portion of the up years to make up for those.

An indefinitely sustainable withdrawal rate is closer to 3.5%.

Also the federal poverty line is horrendously out of touch.

And that’s literally how retirement accounts work, so it’s not really that fucked up a concept

How will you address the hit to morale?

“By making it worse!”

I don’t think it’s the kiddos who are out of touch on this, just the business article writers lacking in meaningful content enough to write this drivel

My PTO rollover is capped

About 4 months before I have to sell any assets. Then about 144 months, not including future growth of those assets before they’re sold. But then I’m broke at nearly 50.

Buy into a broad market tracking ETF (something that tracks s&P 500 or 1000 or similar). That way you’re not betting on individual companies, your betting on the collective largest companies in the world doing well. Over a long period of time, which for over a century has averaged ~7% inflation adjusted return yearly.