• yarr@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 hours ago

    A system run by the government where we all contribute? Sounds like COMMUNISM! No thanks, I’d rather pay my $8,000/mo insurance bill like a REAL MAN. Suffering builds character.

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Public school is communism…

      Roads is communism

      Firefighters is communism

      Military is communism

      And… “thin blue line” is now communist? welp, guess we’re bringing back the pinkertons… 👀 (not a fan of cops btw, but private ones are much worse)

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Roads? Communism. Post offices? Communism. The US constitution? Communism.

      Freedom is where rich people can kill non rich people without repurcussions.

  • GraniteM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Back in 2019 when universal healthcare was being discussed during the Democratic primary, the Pod Save America guys addressed the question of “Who will pay for it??!” with…

    America only ever has one total medical bill, for all the medical expenses and associated costs that we all use, every year. And even if someone doesn’t go to the doctor, then that still eventually adds up to a cost that we all pay, because someday they’ll miss work, or die, or they’ll get really sick and wind up having to declare bankruptcy, and that’s a cost that affects us all, too. There’s no way to subtract from that total cost; either people get the treatment that they need, or the cost gets distributed around anyway, sooner or later. So really, the only variable over which we have meaningful control is how much inefficiency is built into that system, and private insurance is an absolutely massive source of inefficiency.

    Also, I can’t fucking believe that we haven’t had a major campaign on the premise of “Never have to think about your insurance EVER AGAIN!” because every goddamn time I have to think about my insurance, whether I’ve got it, whether it covers what I’m thinking of, whether I’m at the right doctor or not, I feel bile rising in the back of my throat. Having to think about insurance should probably poll at around the same level of rectal polyps, and yet we all have to think about it at some point or other, and it’s fucking bullshit.

  • Sundray@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The fact that so many people think it’s somehow possible for a human being to NOT deserve healthcare, food, or a home is so frustrating to me I could scream myself to death.

    • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      get this, most people thik that some people don’t deserve to live. Different people obviously have different categories of people that they believe don’t deserve to live, be it serial killers or pedophiles, but almost everyone has some people they hate enough to want dead.

  • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    You’re also paying for the care of the homeless, disabled, mentally ill, and otherwise impoverished in the least efficient way possible.

    EMTALA and other regulations mean they’re not able to be turned away from an emergency room without at least an evaluation, and they’re not able to be refused care for an immediately life threatening condition. There’s even regulations at the federal and state levels that determine whether or not they have to be admitted or transferred to higher levels of care or better equipped hospitals. And there’s similar stuff that applies to first responders. So you’re not gonna ask someone about their insurance or go through their pockets for a card before initiating treatment. Most people would agree with this because at even the most basic level they understand that you can’t wait for that to start something like CPR, even if they don’t have enough empathy to think about how fucked up it would be in general to negotiate financial matters when a person is actively dying or to just discontinue CPR when you find out they don’t have insurance. Also what if you make a billing mistake and abort lifesaving care you weren’t supposed to? You can’t bring them back to life. We’d have to degenerate to some pretty deep lows of empathy to start tolerating that kind of thing although I suppose we’re already at levels of degeneracy that shock me.

    But this also means that someone with diabetes or heart disease who can’t afford regular outpatient doctor’s visits is at best utilizing an expensive ER for primary care. At the worst they’re using the ER for repeated expensive emergency treatments when regular outpatient primary care would be much cheaper and more efficient. So instead of getting insulin or antidiabetics like metformin (which are both old as shit and cheap to produce by now) they’re getting IV fluids and medications and intensive monitoring of those therapies. This is also clogging up the ERs so they don’t have the resources to handle genuinely unexpected accidents and other sudden illnesses.

    If they can’t afford a regular doctor, how do people think they’re paying that ER bill? Many hospitals offer financial aid, but where’s that money coming from? And when they just don’t pay at all, who’s paying for those supplies and wages? They can’t get repo’ed so the bill just goes to collections where it also never gets paid. It might get bought at a lower rate by a debt collection company but ultimately the hospital is just eating at least part of the cost and and compensating by charging the people who can pay more.

    So we could be paying for people’s daily oral medications and other treatments that are relatively speaking cheap, but on top of that, these repeated crises are also making these people even less able to afford their care over time. When you chop off a minimum wage workers legs from diabetes related gangrene, they’re not going to go back to a physically intensive job. They might be able to do a call center job but they’re probably also collecting trauma and other mental illnesses too. They’re lucky if their trauma and the constant mental and physical demands of a low wage job haven’t resulted in some kind of substance abuse. They might also be tearing apart their muscles joints and ligaments with repetitive stress injuries that eventually build up to untreatable levels.

    So yeah, you’re already paying for other people’s care, you’re just doing it in the most expensive way possible. And that argument is also assuming you’re a sociopath who doesn’t already care that it’s horribly inhumane.

  • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    This argument is so dumb. It’s quite often paired with " I don’t want to pay for fat people’s and smokers poor life choices", like do you think united Healthcare doesn’t cover the third of the population that’s obese, or is even making them pay more? Unless you’re one of the few people getting Healthcare from the marketplace your insurance provider doesn’t have enough info to assess health risk and adjust prices, you’re employer buys a bulk plan and you become a line in a database with maybe your age on it but not much else. You and your employer are paying the same amount whether your a marathon runner or a chain smoking alcoholic.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      do you think united Healthcare doesn’t cover the third of the population that’s obese, or is even making them pay more?

      That’s just because of Woke Obamacare forcing big government into private decisions. If we get rid of that then I could have real private insurance that benefits me!

      (Yes I know this statement is factually inaccurate, but this is the argument you need to frame yourself against if you want to change the mind of Nazis…I mean elephants.)

    • 4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I promise you that health insurance companies keep track of every fucking detail they can about you, you are not just a “line in a database”, you are not summarized into a group purchase.

      • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        I don’t doubt they do for Healthcare but for the billing system I dont think they are. They aren’t going to your employer and saying Steve is fat so we’re charging an extra $200 for him, but you can pass that on to him so the rest of your employees don’t have to pay. In the end when they go to charge you and your employer they’ll just give you the total rate to cover x people and then split it up by person.

        Correct me if I’m wrong but the administrative overhead and health privacy implications would be too much to assess individual health cost liability.

        Yeah they’re going to keep track of every visit and procedure to make sure you aren’t “overusing” your coverage and deny you if you do, but passing that un aggregated data over to the actuarys seems infeasible.