The most recent #update for #Mastodon has reached three fourth of the followers from @heiseonline@social.heise.de, patching the #preview-bug for them. So we should see most of the traffic coming from here again. Yet, the number of visits from the #Fediverse to heise.de hasn’t really grown that much.

At least, the three #Twitter-alternatives are again bigger than #X, which keeps declining.

In sum, the four networks deliver half as much traffic than #Twitter alone in the beginning of 2022.

#Threads #Bluesky

  • h2owasser🌊@social.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    @mho@social.heise.de @heiseonline@social.heise.de

    But obviosly Mastodon (really Mastodon or all Fediverse? ) is the most important Alternative to X.

  • DerSchulze@elbmatsch.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    23 days ago

    @mho@social.heise.de ich liebe Graphen . Finde ich dennoch weiterhin beeindruckend, das heißt im Grunde ja: Eure Zielgruppe ist hier zu finden. @heiseonline@social.heise.de

  • Collectifission@greennuclear.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    @mho@social.heise.de @heiseonline@social.heise.de Interesting stats. What is your take on why the portion of Threads and Bluesky is so small, compared to Mastodon?

    • Martin Holland@social.heise.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      @collectifission@greennuclear.online

      On #Bluesky @heiseonline@social.heise.de has just a tenth of the followers from here, that’s certainly a big reason. On #Threads it is much more, but as far as I know, we can’t (or don’t) publish automatically (meaning all articles), so there is way less content to click on.

      It’s not my responsibility, but I’ll ask the colleagues, when I see them the next time…