• jadero@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Ingesting gasoline is deadly in far smaller doses due to something called hydrocarbon pneumonia. My dad very nearly died as a result of having a tiny amount get past his throat while siphoning gas to a small engine’s tank.

    If you must siphon gas, go buy a cheap “pump siphon” from Canadian Tire.

    • jadero@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Ingesting gasoline is deadly in far smaller doses due to something called hydrocarbon pneumonia. My dad very nearly died as a result of having a tiny amount get past his throat while siphoning gas to a small engine’s tank.

      If you must siphon gas, go buy a cheap “pump siphon” from Canadian Tire.

    • ExfilBravo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I was going to say I smoke/eat more than 1200mg of THC a day and I’m not dead yet (yes I have a problem and yes it’s expensive).

      • pftbest@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        This is per kilogram of your mass. So if your weight is 80kg then the lethal dose would be 96000mg not 1200. At least that’s how I understand this.

  • Dieinahole@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yeah, I don’t buy this shit at all.

    How many people die each year from acetaminophen overdoses? Versus how many die from THC?

    This whole infographic is a crock of shit

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      You’re confusing 50% lethal dose (medical property of a substance in relation to the body) with death rate (property of a death cause, obtained statistically from a population at a specific time). This is pure medical data which still may be slightly inaccurate, but you can easily check relevant scientific papers for their estimate of the LD₅₀. I think all values presented here are correct within a factor of 2, unless you find a reputable journal stating a very different result. Each substance is available in different concentrations and humans’ exposure to them also varies. You can get lots of pure water, sugar or gasoline easily but not a gram of viruses. Nobody would voluntarily consume a substantial amount of gasoline but nanograms of viruses come and go in the air all the time.

      It is somewhat misleading to group poisons, radioactive isotopes and viruses as they work in very different ways, but the gist is correct. And yes, the LD₅₀ is still a statistical estimate dependent on the humans studied, but not on society etc. like the death rate.

      Edit: some substances will be ejected by the body relatively fast (water), some bioaccumulate (heavy metals) and some “biomutiply” (viruses). This is why you haven’t died despite having drunk lots of water.

      • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        It is somewhat misleading to group poisons, radioactive isotopes and viruses

        Far as I can tell there aren’t any viruses in there? There’s a few bacterial toxins, but they’re… well, toxins.

        Also, the grouping isn’t misleading. Not only is eg. plutonium fairly toxic (because it’s a heavy metal) in addition to giving off ionizing radiation, but calculating an LD50 for something doesn’t require it to be toxic, just that some dose of it kills. There’s some µg/kg ingested (or inhaled or whatever) dose of polonium that will kill 50% of a study animal population dead, regardless of what the mechanism that kills them actually is

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago
        • It is not a guide, I agree
        • It is not trash: there are flaws in the presentation but all data is accurate. You need to read and understand the top text to interpret it correctly.
        • Dieinahole@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Jesus, did you make it? Is it your baby?

          It’s fucking garbage and not at all accurate at best, complete disinformation.

          Go drink some gasoline