cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/18727811

It feels dirty to agree with an ISP on something. But even the worst corporations are on the right side of something from time to time I suppose.

  • gwindli@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    3 months ago

    ISPs just don’t want to be made to police copyright offenses for free. if the RIAA/MPAA paid them money to aid in enforcement, you can bet they be doing it in a heartbeat.

    • downpunxx@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      well, no, there’s no amount of money the riaa/mpaa could pay them, which would justify the amounts lost to terminating services for everyone that’s pirating, lol, they’d go out of business

      • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I hope you’re right, and that people scrolling social media aren’t the biggest source of income to ISP’s.

      • gwindli@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 months ago

        i truly hope you’re right. enforcing copyright offenses for downloaders is an absolute waste of everyone’s resources regardless of who pays. piracy is a market force, and the corpos need to just acknowledge that.

  • Facebones@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Internet access needs to be made a utility and treated as such, essential as any other.

    • pbjamm@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      they want to bring in the most money and expend the least effort. I can respect that.

      Policing customers/users is a PITA and generally sux to do even on the smaller scale of an office. Much cheaper and easier to do nothing.

    • Dept@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      But internet is a service provided by a private company that’s not affiliated with the government. Free speech only applies to government actions.

        • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          There is nothing in law to recognize the internet as a “public place”. Freedom of speech literally only protects your speech from governmental censorship. Simply does not apply online, no matter how much you want it to.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      You are not entitled to a platform, especially one privately-run.